Teori Belajar Taksonomi Bloom dan Implementasinya dalam Pembelajaran

Authors

  • Feni Aprilliyah Universitas Trunojoyo Madura
  • Catur Febian Sukma Indrawati Universitas Trunojoyo Madura
  • Dewi Rohmah Universitas Trunojoyo Madura

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.61692/jpep.v1i3.370

Keywords:

Bloom’s Taxonomy, Learning Objectives, Educational

Abstract

Bloom's Taxonomy is a systematic framework used to classify educational objectives into three main domains: cognitive, affective, and psychomotor. This framework aims to assist teachers in designing learning goals that are clear, measurable, and aligned with students' needs. This study employs a literature review method by analyzing articles and scholarly journals obtained from Google Scholar within the last five years. The revision of Bloom's Taxonomy by Anderson and Krathwohl updated the terminology and adapted the approach to be more relevant to the context of modern education. This article discusses the definition, characteristics, implementation, as well as the strengths and limitations of Bloom's Taxonomy. The findings indicate that the use of Bloom's Taxonomy can enhance the effectiveness of the learning process, although there are still some challenges in its application. The implementation of this taxonomy is essential in developing curricula, instructional strategies, and more focused assessment instruments.

Author Biographies

Catur Febian Sukma Indrawati, Universitas Trunojoyo Madura

Bloom's Taxonomy is a systematic framework used to classify educational objectives into three main domains: cognitive, affective, and psychomotor. This framework aims to assist teachers in designing learning goals that are clear, measurable, and aligned with students' needs. This study employs a literature review method by analyzing articles and scholarly journals obtained from Google Scholar within the last five years. The revision of Bloom's Taxonomy by Anderson and Krathwohl updated the terminology and adapted the approach to be more relevant to the context of modern education. This article discusses the definition, characteristics, implementation, as well as the strengths and limitations of Bloom's Taxonomy. The findings indicate that the use of Bloom's Taxonomy can enhance the effectiveness of the learning process, although there are still some challenges in its application. The implementation of this taxonomy is essential in developing curricula, instructional strategies, and more focused assessment instruments.

Dewi Rohmah, Universitas Trunojoyo Madura

Bloom's Taxonomy is a systematic framework used to classify educational objectives into three main domains: cognitive, affective, and psychomotor. This framework aims to assist teachers in designing learning goals that are clear, measurable, and aligned with students' needs. This study employs a literature review method by analyzing articles and scholarly journals obtained from Google Scholar within the last five years. The revision of Bloom's Taxonomy by Anderson and Krathwohl updated the terminology and adapted the approach to be more relevant to the context of modern education. This article discusses the definition, characteristics, implementation, as well as the strengths and limitations of Bloom's Taxonomy. The findings indicate that the use of Bloom's Taxonomy can enhance the effectiveness of the learning process, although there are still some challenges in its application. The implementation of this taxonomy is essential in developing curricula, instructional strategies, and more focused assessment instruments.

References

Hidayati, R., & Sutrisno, B. (2020). Literature review: Metode dan langkah-langkah dalam penelitian pendidikan. Jurnal Pendidikan Nusantara, 3(1), 55–63.

Kartini, N. E., Nurdin, E. S., Hakam, K. A., & Syihabuddin, S. (2022). Telaah revisi teori domain kognitif Taksonomi Bloom dan keterkaitannya dalam Kurikulum Pendidikan Agama Islam. Jurnal Basicedu, 6(4), 7292–7302. https://doi.org/10.31004/basicedu.v6i4.3478

Marta, M. A., Purnomo, D., & Gusmameli, G. (2025). Konsep Taksonomi Bloom dalam desain pembelajaran. Lencana: Jurnal Inovasi Ilmu Pendidikan, 3(1), 227–246. https://doi.org/10.55606/lencana.v3i1.4572

Nafiati, D. A. (2021). Revisi Taksonomi Bloom: Kognitif, afektif, dan psikomotorik. Humanika: Kajian Ilmiah Mata Kuliah Umum, 21(2), 151–172. https://dx.doi.org/10.21831/hum.v21i2.29252

Putra, R. P. (2024). Objek evaluasi hasil belajar Pendidikan Agama Islam: Analisis Taksonomi Bloom (kognitif, afektif, psikomotorik). Edu Global: Jurnal Pendidikan Islam, 5(1), 18–26. https://doi.org/10.56874/eduglobal.v5i1.1590

Syamsuddin, A. R., & Damaianti, V. S. (2020). Metode penelitian kualitatif dalam kajian bahasa dan sastra. Remaja Rosdakarya.

Tandjung, F. L., Banik, L. A., Ningati, D. K., Foeh, Y., & Selan, A. (2025). HOTS-based instrument development training in the Independent Learning Curriculum for Enonekmese State Middle School teachers. Transformasi: Jurnal Pengabdian Pada Masyarakat, 5(1), 99–112. https://dx.doi.org/10.31764/transformasi.v5i1.30066

Downloads

Published

2024-12-31

How to Cite

Aprilliyah, F., Indrawati, C. F. S., & Rohmah, D. (2024). Teori Belajar Taksonomi Bloom dan Implementasinya dalam Pembelajaran. Jurnal Pengembangan Dan Evaluasi Pendidikan, 1(3), 137–142. https://doi.org/10.61692/jpep.v1i3.370